Net Neutrality

[fschmidt]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[Allen]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[fschmidt]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[Peter]

this guy is a conspiracy wind bag but the main point hes getting to is that he claims Net Neutrality does not mean a free choice of ISPs(as ISP companies already has monopoly due to regulation) and certainly not free speech and content but because of the cost of bandwidth and "peering" which benefits big companies like Google because they can have special "lanes" in "peering" without regulation.

[fschmidt]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[Peter]

against, because he claims that net neutrality has nothing to do with free speech but the cost of bandwidth. ISPs don't regulate content, its the social media and internet giants.

[Allen]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[fschmidt]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[Allen]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[fschmidt]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[Peter]

ISP care for content? My impression is that it’s the internet companies do, not the ISPs. Bandwidth and censorship are two separate things. “Censoring” traffic would mean refusing paying customers service which makes no sense

[fschmidt]

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

[Peter]

Where would you go?