proposed changes

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

proposed changes

fschmidt
Administrator
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: proposed changes

Drealm
We can talk about this tomorrow but I want to post some thoughts so I don't forget.

I think the wording of the declaration should be changed, but not to what you say.

I've personally viewed the rules like commandments as opposed to regulations like you find enumerated in Deuteronomy. Every time the rules are changed it undermines them as a commandment. I'm fine with them being changed if they are only a regulation but not if they are anything resembling a commandment. So I would rather the declaration from now on explicitly states that it is a regulation.

The people who follow Mikraite regulations and who make this declaration and abide by it are my people.

The declaration as it stands now is a one time thing. By keeping it a one time thing this makes it a unique transition from non-Mikraite to Mikraite. I think by it being a one time thing it is closer to a tradition and it feels like it carries more weight. I would rather there be a new declaration made specifically for renewing. It could be something like:

I renew...

About being required to attend a good religious service I don't see the immediate practical value in this but I'm open to hearing your reasoning for it. Also for most people their only options will be Islam or Orthodox Judaism. Anabaptists are usually far away.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: proposed changes

Drealm
We talked about this for a while after our last meeting.

When we narrowed things down I think the conclusion we arrived at was that you're proposing this because you a) want people to be exposed to other religions and b) you're not confident people will do this on their own. I agreed with these conclusions but I've thought about this more.

I was going to write something long winded but I think it's better to keep this as short as possible to focus on our core differences.

I think our core difference is that fundamentally speaking you see religion first as concepts and second as identity. You prioritize concepts over identity and are willing to suppress or adopt a new identity For example you would be perfectly happy attending a Nazi meeting or an Eritrean service if they followed your concepts and allowed you to join.

Maybe this reflects why you like researching other religions and I don't. You are identity neutral and don't invest your ego in any anything. Where as I need an identity for everything else to work.

What you're proposing obviously conflicts with someone who cares about identity.

Maybe I am alone here. I would like to hear what others in our group say. And I would like to talk about identity next meeting.

How important is identity to others in this group?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: proposed changes

fschmidt
Administrator
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: proposed changes

Drealm
fschmidt wrote
Mikraite currently handles concepts fine.
I agree.

fschmidt wrote
What it doesn't handle is identity.
I think identity is a spectrum with different degrees of overlap. If you look at our group we have things in common that we take for granted. We are all western or westernized, living in the west, mostly American, English speaking, essentially atheist, enlightened leaning, more or less egalitarian minded and traumatized by modern culture. No we are not the same race. Obviously this is a weak identity but it's still a lot of things that we take for granted. I don't think we would of gravitated to each other if we didn't have a number of these overlaps.

fschmidt wrote
The religions I visit don't share my concepts
By concepts I mean segregating gender and following the Old Testament. I don't know what you refer to this as.

fschmidt wrote
, but they address identity.
So you've been going to a mosque, do you identify as a Muslim or Arab or middle eastern?

fschmidt wrote
I don't expect Mikraites to adopt the identity of these religions,
You expect Mikraites to parrot the identity of these religions, which is actually worst. This attacks your own identity without replacing it with a better one.

fschmidt wrote
but I do expect attending these religions to cause Mikraites to identify less with modern culture.
I disagree. There is no such thing as subtraction without replacement. You are replacing "modern" culture with imitating traditional culture.

fschmidt wrote
You feel more comfortable going to a Starbucks than to a mosque, and for me it is the reverse. This is because your identity is still more aligned with modern culture than with other cultures.
 

It is not the reverse for you. You don't have an identity to begin with. You don't identify based on language, race, geography. You freely admit that you are not racist. To you everything is the same. This is why you can just as easily hop from Orthodox Jewish to Islam to Mennonites. That is a unique way of thinking. Most people are not that free thinking. Find for me another Orthodox Jew, Muslim or Mennonite who would do the same as you.